Friday, February 6, 2009

MAPS

AR-309: ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING (B)
By

RAVINDAR KUMAR
Assistant Professor
Department of Architecture and Planning
NED University of Engineering and Technology
Karachi

LECTURE NO. 07
TOPIC: MAPS

Introduction:
The theme of current lecture is Maps. In the following a detailed description about maps is given for the understanding of students learning town planning.

What is a map?[1]

A map is a visual representation of an area or a symbolic depiction highlighting relationships between elements of that space such as objects, regions, and themes. Many maps are static two-dimensional, geometrically accurate representations of three-dimensional space, while others are dynamic or interactive, even three-dimensional. Although most commonly used to depict geography, maps may represent any space, real or imagined, without regard to context or scale.

Map Making or Cartography:[2]

Cartography or mapmaking is the study and practice of making representations of the Earth on a flat surface. Cartography combines science, aesthetics, and technical ability to create a balanced and readable representation that is capable of communicating information effectively and quickly.

History of Map Making:[3]

The earliest known map is a matter of some debate, both because the definition of "map" is not sharp and because some artifacts speculated to be maps might actually be something else. A wall painting which may depict the ancient Anatolian city of Çatalhöyük (previously known as Catal Huyuk or Çatal Hüyük) has been dated to the late 7th millennium BCE.[4]/[5] The ancient Greeks and Romans created maps beginning at latest in the 6th century BC. As early as the 700s, Arab scholars were translating the works of the Greek geographers into Arabic. In ancient China, geographical literature spans back to the 5th century BC. The oldest extant Chinese maps come from the State of Qin, dated back to the 4th century BC during the Warring States era. Early forms of cartography of India included legendary paintings; maps of locations described in Indian epic poetry, for example the Ramayana. Indian cartographic traditions also covered the locations of the Pole star, and other constellations of use. The Arab geographer, Muhammad al-Idrisi, produced his medieval atlas Tabula Rogeriana in 1154. He incorporated the knowledge of Africa, the Indian Ocean and the Far East gathered by Arab merchants and explorers with the information inherited from the classical geographers to create the most accurate map of the world up until his time.

It remained the most accurate world map for the next three centuries.[6] In the Age of Exploration from the 15th century to the 17th century, European cartographers both copied earlier maps (some of which had been passed down for centuries) and drew their own based on explorers' observations and new surveying techniques. The invention of the magnetic compass, telescope and sextant enabled increasing accuracy. In 1492, Martin Behaim, a German cartographer, made the oldest extant globe of the Earth.[7] In 1507, Martin Waldseemüller produced a globular world map bearing the first use of the name "America". Due to the sheer physical difficulties inherent in cartography, map-makers frequently lifted material from earlier works without giving credit to the original cartographer. By the 1700s, map-makers started to give credit to the original engraver by printing the phrase "After [the original cartographer]" on the work.[8]
In cartography, technology has continually changed in order to meet the demands of new generations of mapmakers and map users. The first maps were manually constructed with brushes and parchment and therefore varied in quality and were limited in distribution. The advent of magnetic devices, such as the compass and much later magnetic storage devices allowed for the creation of far more accurate maps and the ability to store and manipulate them digitally. In the late 20th century and early 21st century advances in electronic technology led to a new revolution in cartography. Specifically, computer hardware devices such as computer screens, plotters, printers, scanners (remote and document) and analytic stereo plotters along with visualization, image processing, spatial analysis and database software, have democratized and greatly expanded the making of maps.

Map types:[9]

In understanding basic maps, the field of cartography can be divided into two general categories: general cartography and thematic cartography. General cartography involves those maps that are constructed for a general audience and thus contain a variety of features. Thematic cartography involves maps of specific geographic themes oriented toward specific audiences. As the volume of geographic data has exploded over the last century, thematic cartography has become increasingly useful and necessary to interpret spatial, cultural and social data. An orienteering map combines both general and thematic cartography, designed for a very specific user community. A topographic map is primarily concerned with the topographic description of a place, including the use of contour lines showing elevation, Terrain or relief. A topological map is a very general type of map. It often disregards scale and detail in the interest of clarity of communicating specific route or relational information. “A topographic map is a detailed and accurate graphic representation of cultural and natural features on the ground. Topographic maps have multiple uses in the present day: any type of geographic planning or large-scale architecture; earth sciences and many other geographic disciplines which use highly detailed maps in its standard requirements.”

Maps for planning and development of urban areas:

Town Planning and allied professions have always been demanding suitable base maps as a prerequisite to any planning.[10] Maps are not new to town planners and engineers. However, preparation and use of large-scale maps, especially for urban areas, is not as good as in developed and other developing countries.

Maps are required by every Department/agency of the Provincial and Federal Governments having stake in development of urban area. Local authorities, public undertakings, service organizations require maps. However, the requirement of maps in terms of contents, quality and accuracy vary from organization to organization. Also, some organizations use maps every day while some use maps occasionally yet some others use maps once in a way. It is important to note that all the agencies aforementioned and others do not need comprehensive map, i.e. all the information in map. In the myriad of agencies involved in planning and development of towns and cities it is the agencies responsible for planning for physical development, which need maps most. Municipal authorities rank second in use of maps - comprehensive maps are required for planning and execution of works by engineering department, maps of buildings/plots for taxation and election purposes.

The institutions like urban development authorities, Local authorities - Engineering and Health Departments, Power Transmission and distribution agencies, Agencies for Urban Water Supply and Drainage system, Survey, Settlement and Land Records (City Survey) Department, Agencies for city transport system, Fire Force, Police Department - Traffic & Law and Order and Postal Department requires the maps on daily basis. Whereas; other institutions like Public Works Departments, National Highways Authority, Railways, Housing boards, Education Department, Health Department, Census Department and Election Commission requires the maps occasionally. Similarly the maps are required for different purposes. Full topographic maps at different scales are required by Urban Development Authorities for preparation/ revision of Comprehensive Development Plans, Zonal Plans (Sectoral Plans), Neighbourhood Plans, Sub-division Plans, Town Planning Schemes, etc. in the local planning area.[11]

The Scale of Maps:[12]

The scale of a map is the ratio of a single unit of distance on the map, to the equivalent distance on the ground.[13] Maps are sometimes referred to by relative descriptions of large scale or small scale. A large scale map displays objects so they appear relatively large. For example, an island displayed on a 1:10,000 map will appear larger than if displayed on a 1:100,000 map. Thus, the former is large scale. Maps with a ratio of 1:50,000 or larger (for example, 1:25,000 would be larger) are considered large scale. Maps with a ratio of 1:50,000 to 1:250,000 are considered medium scale. Any maps with a smaller scale (for example 1:500,000) are considered small scale.[14]

The scale of map to be used for a particular purpose in a project is determined as to what topographical features and what plan elements (details) are required to be shown with a certain degree of clarity on one or more sheets. Thus, to show a concept for circulation system and layout of plots in a sub-division plan (layout), in any urban area, a 1:2,000 scale map may be adequate. But, if details on plot numbers, entrance to plots, plot dimensions, centre line of roads, chamfers, asphalt, alignment of services like water, electricity and telephone, planting of trees, etc. are to be shown, maps at scale 1:1,000 would be needed. If the width of plot and roads is less than 10 m then a 1:500 scale map would be required to show all the afore cited details.
Process in planning - Best Practice:

Requirement of maps in terms of content, accuracy, scale, etc. in planning and development of urban areas can be appreciated well when the process involved in planning for physical development and implementation is known. Planning urban areas, especially metropolitan areas and cities, may have three stages, although they can vary:
  • Outline Development Plan (ODP) now re-christened as Perspective Plan, at macro (city/town) level;
  • Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) also at macro level. This can also be called Master Plan;
  • Zonal Plans for part of city/town to elaborate the details; and
  • Town Planning Schemes at micro (local) level to implement the plan.

These levels are basically to perceive, conceptualize and see details from city/ town level to part of city/town and local level. These levels naturally require maps at different scales with different content with one or fewer maps to see the area under consideration.


For instance for planning a metro rail system or a bypass for rail or road, entire metropolitan area or city as the case may be has to be on only one or two sheets for all to see the alignment at metropolitan or city level. To fine tune the alignment, to avoid insurmountable obstacles, more and more details will be needed for which maps have to be at larger and larger scales. Only important features are shown on maps at small scale. All the features would be required at detail planning. What features in base map and what elements in plan proposal need to be shown on map user (planners, public and decision makers) determine the scale(s) for maps at a particular level.
Preparation of Master Plan:

Preparation of Master Plan at Metro/city level is highly complex and needs multi- disciplinary team of experts. However, the experts who steer the work on planning are the physical planners. Before embarking on making projections for demographic aspects to estimate the land required to meet the growth during the plan horizon, several studies are carried out by physical planners apart from other discipline. Most important planning survey is the use of building and parcels of lands, not only in the existing developed area but also in the vicinity, what is called Local Planning Area.

Planning studies:

Statutes on Town and Country Planning in all the States require preparation of Existing Land Use of every plot/property. Land uses are classified broadly in to 8 main groups. Not only that, a register showing the land use of every property need to be prepared and maintained along with the existing land use map. Hard copies of maps must be as large as 1:1,000 to mark the land use in field and to prepare fair maps in office; A GIS in deed, but in hard copy form.

Another planning survey for physical aspect is structural condition survey. This survey assumes importance in old areas due for redevelopment and/or rejuvenation. Structural conditions of buildings are classified in to 4 or 5 classes: very good, good, moderate, poor and obsolete. This survey is for structures for which each and every structure must clearly be available on maps to mark the appropriate condition in the field and to prepare fair maps in office. For this purpose also maps must be at least 1:1,000 if not at 1:500. This is yet another GIS earlier to electronic era.

All these maps need to be documented for reference and record, lest they are called for in courts of law. Large-scale maps show limited area on a sheet. They need to be generalized to prepare smaller scale maps: 1:5,000, 1:10,000, 1:20,000 to depict parts of urban area or the whole urban area on one or two sheets. The principle of Part to whole be applied which is similar to preparation of smaller scale maps from survey data at larger scale. Planning studies other than Land Use and Structural Condition are for:
  • Density of population/house holds;
  • House hold survey for social, economic conditions which is a sample survey;
  • Traffic and transportation survey;
  • Problems in physical condition like congested areas, narrow roads, bottlenecks, bad junctions, low lying areas, pollution from industry, etc.

All these surveys are not aimed at each and every property and maps at small scales, say 1:5,000, 1:10,000 and 1:20,000 may suffice. Analysis of the physical aspect - Land Use and Structural Condition - and socio-economic aspects, problems in physical form, function, need to be made and results shown on small scale maps: 1:5,000, 1:10,000 and 1:20,000. After the land requirement for future growth is established, land availability has to be analyzed for suitability for development. To show the results of the analysis as thematic maps also smaller scale maps, say 1:5,000, 1:10,000 and 1:20,000, area required. Result of each of the study on separate maps (transparencies) at smaller scale (all at same scale) will be compared with one above the other (sounds like GIS in place!) to synthesis the studies and draw inference. The maps showing the results of planning studies at small scales, on one or two sheets, are the basis on which alternative plans at macro level are conceptualized.

Concept plans:

Concept plans are free hand sketches on the base of accurate maps, at smaller scale (1:10,000 or 1:20,000 depending on the planning area) on one or two sheets, to show the boundaries of land areas for different uses, arterial and lower order road system, railway system, density of population/ house holds, etc. However, boundaries of proposed land uses and road system will not have any definite geometry.

Master Plan:

After a concept or combination of two or three is accepted, Master Plan (CDP) is prepared on accurate map at larger scales, say 1:20,000 or 1:10,000 (for Metros and large cities), and 1:5,000 for others.

Format of maps for Master Plan/Planning Drawings:[15]

Town planners, Architects and Engineers convert topographical maps in to working drawings to work on. They use the ISO A Series sheet formats for their drawings. Ammonia prints of drawings on A0 to A3 have to be folded to A4 size to have title block on top to go into files, storage, used in field and sent across by mail. Planning drawings must be in Landscape format. Planning drawings at any scale for any coverage must always be on base of scientifically prepared topographical map. Planning drawings will have legend and title block column at the right hand side of sheet from top to bottom. Column width can be 100 to 175 mm. Title block must be at bottom-right corner.

The drawings of Master Plan approved by Government are statutory and need to be preserved for long time. Album form is best to the purpose. Further, drawings must be compact and handy to go in to album without folding. For this purpose, A1 size (841 x 594 mm) is best both in album and handling on desk and in field. All the drawings in the Master Plan may be to A1 size in modular form. Topographical maps at scale 1:5,000 with an 800 x 400 mm format covering 4 x 2 km (8 sq km) fits within A1size with sufficient margin at bottom for full length for legend and title block and fit in a handy album.

Preparation of Zonal Plans:

The phase of Zonal Plan is between Master Plan and detail plan. Zonal plans are enlargement of Master Plan for part of city or town or for a particular land use zone. Zonal Plan include plan document to supplement the plan (drawing). Zonal plans may show even the minor roads but may not show individual properties which are very small. Maps for Zonal Plan must be at 1:2,000 to show all the details; but neither dimensions nor all properties. Town planners’ role does not end on preparation and approval of Master Plan and Zonal Plan at small scale to remain as wall maps for adoration. His role includes translating Master Plan/Zonal Plan in to Action Area Plans.

Preparation of Area Plan:

Area plans are action plans to implement the proposals in Master Plan. It may be for extension of city/town or rejuvenation or redevelopment of old and blighted areas. Master Plan is the basis for Area Planning. Maps for Area Plan start at the scale of Master Plan (1:5,000) to delineate the area for planning. Site plan at scale 1:1,000 will be required with additional survey data - cadastral boundary and topography and service cadastre. Maps may be in modular form. But, to see the concept (Master Plan content) for the whole area on one sheet site plan has to be at smaller scale. The Master Plan may be fine tuned on the accurate site plan.

Draft details plan, keeping the Master Plan concept as it is or with modifications, is prepared on a large scale, say 1:2,000, to show all the details in the plan - plots with numbers, roads, road elements like carriage way, centre line, junction details, plot dimensions, even entrance to plots, etc. Details plans may be in modular form. After the Draft Plan is approved detailed plan is finalized on maps at scale 1:1,000 to show all details and dimensions. Dimensions are also indicated to help setting-out and to prepare engineering designs. But, Plan is not fit for allotment of plots and for development. Physical planner’s responsibilities do not end after preparation of Master Plan at small scale. Physical planner must co-ordinate development as well not only organizing and overseeing setting-out of his plan on ground but also there after.

Conclusion:

Finally it is quite clearly spelled out that the understanding about maps is very significant and a prerequisite for the person involved in any town planning exercise.

References:

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_making
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps
[4] Robert Kunzig (1999). "A Tale of two obsessed archeologists, one ancient city, and nagging doubts about whether science can ever hope to reveal the past" Discover Magazine, May 1999. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps
[5] Stephanie Meece (2006). "A bird’s eye view - of a leopard’s spots The Çatalhöyük ‘map’ and the development of cartographic representation in prehistory" Anatolian Studies, 56:1-16 From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps
[6] S. P. Scott (1904), History of the Moorish Empire, pp. 461-2 From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps
[7] http://www.loc.gov/rr/geogmap/guide/gmillgtm.html
[8] http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/forgery/002035-300-e.html?PHPSESSID=el7bd0vpd8cto0amsqqq5kaj22
[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographic_map
[10] Prabhakar Misra (2001) “The Changing Frame of Town Planning “ From http://www.gisdevelopment.net/magazine/gisdev/2001/apr/perspective.shtml
[11] L. R. Rudraiah (2003) “Maps for planning and development of urban areas” published in proceedings Map India Conference 2003 From: http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/urban/overview/mi03243.htm
[12] http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/urban/overview/mi03243a.htm
[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_(map)
[14] http://geography.about.com/cs/maps/a/mapscale.htm
[15] http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/urban/overview/mi03243b.htm

INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR TOWN PLANNING

AR-309: ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING (B)


By:


RAVINDAR KUMAR
Assistant Professor
Department of Architecture and Planning
NED University of Engineering and Technology
Karachi


LECTURE NO. 06
TOPIC: INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR TOWN PLANNING



1. Introduction:


In any town planning exercise a lot of information required and different kinds of databases are prepared. These databases contain the information regarding physical, social and economic conditions of both existing and proposed town. Similarly; town planning maps are made for every component of planning; such as maps for geography, geology, climate, history, society, economy, religion, ethnicity and culture etc. The information is also required for existing land & terrain, natural resources, socioeconomic conditions and as built landuse of the given area for which planning is to be carried out.


Thus the theme “Information Required for Town Planning” leads us to identify the objectives of town planning and the process of town planning to be employed in any given context; on the basis of which the types of information may be sorted out. In addition the definition of town planning in any context may also lead us to identify the information required for town planning.


2. Information Required for Town Planning in United Kingdom (UK):


If one look at the definition of town planning in United Kingdom (UK) it narrates that, “Town and Country Planning is the land use planning system by which governments seek to maintain a balance between economic development and environmental quality.”[1] Thus; the information required for town planning in UK must be regarding the key words explained in the definition i.e. land use characteristics, economic characteristics and environmental characteristics. Similarly; for each context the information required shall be subject to the nature of town planning to be employed in a given context. In the following the information required for town planning shall be described in some detail especially with reference to definition of Town planning in UK.


3. Information Required for Land Use Planning:


As discussed above land use was the first key word in UK for which information is required. “Land use is the human modification of natural environment or wilderness into built environment such as fields, pastures, and settlements”[2]

Thus the information required for land use is the existing condition of land where planning is to be carried out and the changes in the physical three dimensional characteristics of land where natural environment is transformed into built environment. Furthermore another information is required here is the reasons of the changes in the land use and the actors involved in that change. Thus in this way one may plan for the future of that particular land use that exists there and suggest ways and means to improve the over all land use pattern.


4. Information Required For Economic Development:


“Economic development is the development of economic wealth of countries or regions for the well-being of their inhabitants. It is the process by which a nation improves the economic, political, and social well being of its people.[3]


From a policy perspective, economic development can be defined as efforts that seek to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for a community by creating and/or retaining jobs and supporting or growing incomes and the tax base.”[4]


In this key word of Economic Development the information required shall be regarding inhabits of any context, their political and social conditions, quality of life, income, jobs and taxes.


5. Information Required for Environmental Quality:


Environmental quality is a set of properties and characteristics of the environment, either generalized or local, as they impinge on human beings and other organisms.[5]


‘Environmental quality is a general term which can refer to varied characteristics that relate to the natural environment as well as the built environment, such as air and water purity or pollution, noise and the potential effects which such characteristics may have on physical and mental health caused by human activities.’[6]


In case of the phrase environmental quality the information required include characteristics of environment in given context, existing natural and built environment i.e. air, water, land pollution etc.


6. Conclusion:


Collectively if one combines all these three key words of land use planning, economic development and environmental quality as per definition of town planning in UK the information required would be manifold and of numerous types.


Similarly; context to context the information required for town planning would be different from one another; whereas, the objectives of town planning may also be said as the major determinant of the information required.


Another perspective to look at this issue is with reference to key aspects of town planning which may also be a major determinant for information required. These include physical, geographical, geological, climatic, social, economic, historic, cultural, religious and environmental conditions of any context.

References:


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_and_country_planning_in_the_United_Kingdom
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landuse
[3] Sullivan, arthur, Steven M. Sheffrin (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp 471 ISBN 0-13-063085-3 http://www.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZ3R9&PMDbSiteId=2781&PMDbSolutionId=6724&PMDbCategoryId=&PMDbProgramId=12881&level=4
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_development
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Quality
[6] http://glossary.eea.europa.eu/EEAGlossary/E/environmental_quality

ASSIGNMENT: MAKING A MAP OF KARACHI

AR- 309: Architecture & Town Planning (B)

MAKING A MAP OF KARACHI

By

RAVINDAR KUMAR
B. Arch, M. Urban Design
Assistant Professor, DAP-NED


1. Introduction:

Karachi the Mega city of its time is waiting for planning and reform. Karachi has 18 towns and 178 union councils. Many attempts for Master Planning of Karachi were made in the past. However; not a single Master Plan was really enforced or fully implemented in Karachi. The planning of Karachi is not an easy task and there are many reasons for it. The first and foremost reason is the size of this city. Planning for such a large Mega city requires making lot's of maps that may reflect its physical and socioeconomic conditions at present and establish the needs for the future. But before going into that endeavor at first it is necessary to have a base map of Karachi to understand the characteristics of this city. This assignment is basically developed to give the students of town planning practical hands on and glimpse of the works carried out by a city planner. Whereas; the significance of this assignment is that after doing this assignment the students would really feel proud of them that at least they know the names and location of different places in the city and made a map of the city. It would also make them realize the significance of Town Planning.

2. Objective:

In this assignment the objective is to reproduce the Map of Karachi which is already published by the Survey of Pakistan. Because; it is near to impossible that students may make a base map of Karachi on their own.

3. Methodology:

The process of making this map is given below.
  • At first; collect or buy any large guide Map of Karachi (A-1 Sheet Size) as published by Survey of Pakistan
  • Secondly; buy a thick tracing sheet of equal size as Map along with black pointers of point size 2, 3 and 5 as well as colour markers
  • Thirdly; collect your group members to a common place and trace the map from original and colour
  • Finally; try to make as exact map as possible with maximum details.

4. Submission:

The final submission of map is expected on 20th March 2010. Please bring original map along with your traced map so as to judge the quality of your map.

PLANNING FOR KARACHI

http://www.shehri.org/kplan.htm

KARACHI A DIVIDED CITY

http://www.ceri-sciencespo.com/archive/mai03/artlg.pdf

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

MODERN PLANNING IN PAKISTAN AND ABROAD

AR-309: ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING (B)
By:
RAVINDAR KUMAR
Assistant Professor
Department of Architecture and Planning
NED University of Engineering and Technology
Karachi

LECTURE NO. 05
TOPIC: MODERN PLANNING IN PAKISTAN AND ABROAD

Introduction:
Before beginning of description about, “Modern Planning in Pakistan and Abroad” it is important to understand the term ‘Modern’ and the phrase ‘Modern Planning’. The understanding of these two concepts would lead us to make the beginning of this topic. Secondly it would be interesting to develop a historical perspective of planning attempts made abroad in western world and then in Pakistan. Particularly; with reference to Master Planning, development of planning institutions in Pakistan and development pattern of settlements in major cities and towns of Pakistan would clearly spell out the theme of current lecture.

Modernity and Modern:
Modernity is a term that refers to the modern era. It is distinct from modernism, and, in different contexts, refers to cultural and intellectual movements of the period c. 1630-1940. The term "modern" can refer to many different things. Colloquially, it can refer in a general manner to the 20th century. For historians, the Early Modern Period refers to the period roughly from 1500 to 1800, with the Modern era beginning sometime during the 18th century. In this schema, industrialization during the 19th century marks the first phase of modernity, while the 20th century marks the second. Some schools of thought hold that modernity ended in the late 20th century, replaced by post-modernity, while others would extend modernity to cover the developments denoted by post-modernity and into the present.[1]

Modernism and Modern Planning:
Modernism describes an array of cultural movements rooted in the changes in Western society in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. The term covers a series of reforming movements in art, architecture, music, literature and the applied arts which emerged during this period. At its most basic level, Modernism could be described as the experimentation and fragmentation of the human experience, characterized by deviations from the norms of society.[2]

It wasn't until the 1920s that modernism began to surface. Based on the ideas of Le Corbusier and utilising new skyscraper building techniques, the modernist city stood for the elimination of disorder, congestion and the small scale, replacing them instead with preplanned and widely spaced freeways and tower blocks set within gardens.

There were plans for large scale rebuilding of cities, such as the Plan Voisin (based on Le Corbusier's Ville Contemporaine), which proposed clearing and rebuilding most of central Paris. No large-scale plans were implemented until after World War II however. Throughout the late 1940s and 1950s, housing shortages caused by war destruction led many cities around the world to build substantial amounts of government-subsidized housing blocks. Planners at the time used the opportunity to implement the modernist ideal of towers surrounded by gardens. The most prominent example of an entire modernist city is Brasilia, constructed between 1956 and 1960 in Brazil.

By the late 1960s and early 1970s, many planners were coming to realize that the imposition of modernist clean lines and a lack of human scale also tended to sap vitality from the community. This was expressed in high crime and social problems within many of these planned neighbourhoods. Modernism can be said to have ended in the 1970s when the construction of the cheap, uniform tower blocks ended in many countries, such as Britain and France. Since then many have been demolished and in their way more conventional housing has been built. Rather than attempting to eliminate all disorder, planning now concentrates on individualism and diversity in society and the economy. This is the post-modernist era.[3]

Modern Planning Abroad:
In order to understand the modern planning abroad one may refer to encyclopedia of urban planning by Whittick Arnold and read the contemporary theories and practices in the western world. It narrates that since 16th century the mode of planning cities is divided in seven main categories.

i. The Authoritarian Planning
ii. The Utilitarian Planning
iii. The Romantic Planning
iv. The Utopian Planning
v. The Technocratic Utopia
vi. The Technocratic Planning
vii. The Organic Planning

Following is the detailed description of these planning types.

Authoritarian Planning:
It is basically a geometric planning which emerged in 16th century onwards under priestly dictators & absolute monarchs who wanted to create an urban setting which can emphasize their power structure in society. The principles of this kind of planning include a long street, uniform blank front and an open plaza for a monument or obelisk. However, when same principles applied to city as a whole as a ideal “geometric” plans for political capitals i.e. Washington, Brasilia, Islamabad the plan become truly functional setting only for government. Such design of cities can only be maintained through legal regulations and in long run it must be modified & rebuild. Because these plans are made by ignoring social & economic needs. The major fault in authoritarian planning is not in its geometry but false assumptions of centralized power that ignores the important functions of neighborhoods. Although the authoritarian planning neglects the essential functions of city, however the gift that occurs through geometric scheme is of parks and open spaces; or a main boulevard or some important roads. The most striking example of authoritarian planning is in Baroque, which is a star like fortification which is the only and ephemeral contribution of geometric planning.

The basic element in geometric planning is a square or rectangular blocks with streets and avenues composed by assembling and extending such blocks. The major advantage of this grid iron plan is open spaces provided as a setting for major public buildings. The disadvantage of this planning is the automatic extension by this method that raise the cost by increasing the number and area for unnecessary streets & pavements whose services crates a heavy burden on municipality, because they have to provide transportation facilities water, sewerage, schools & health facilities for whole area.

The Utilitarian Planning:
With the continuation geometric planning there emerges the utilitarian planning which are basically the repercussions of geometric extension of the town. It is also termed as commercial utilitarian planning because its major objective is to maximize the returns from sale & rent. Since last three centuries large number of new towns or town extensions developed on this theory that the ideal municipal facilities should be provided on open land where the large population to be housed with maximum use of available space for built structures & minimum space availability for parks, play ground & open public spaces. The other aspect of utilitarian planning is the encouragement of private sector investments in the development. On paper the grid iron plan shows a strict order & harmony of built structures. However the three dimensional building structures when emerged out of these plans it shows a monotonous & confusing pattern with too many similar open spaces, streets & avenues.

The utilitarian planning has been carried out on day to day basis by the municipal engineer, the land developer, the transportation expert, the commercial builder and real estate investor with no thought of public welfare or municipal economy. Originally the utilitarian planning is the product of laissez faire economics which assumes that order & purpose would emerge out of unrestricted private competition. The utilitarian planning also concentrate on increasing the mechanical facilities to accommodate expanding population with the sacrifice of other social functions. Therefore utilitarian planning lead to misuse of whole environment, i.e. the sewerage & industrial waste poured into near by water channels which destroy a vital recreational space. The utilitarian planning leads to the profit making process, and the result of utilitarian planning emerges in the form of inefficient urban spaces, congestion, more built up areas then open spaces and lacking of domestic amenities. Considering these repercussions of utilitarian planning it is quite vital that it should be regulated and a coherent pattern should be superimposed upon its random structures. It requires a series of municipal regulations to control the land uses through limitations of heights & density of buildings. Therefore zoning regulations are quite vital to curb the utilitarian planning.

Romantic Planning:
When the utilitarian planning practice become supreme in cities, there occurred a revolt against it and a new philosophy took shape in the form of a Romantic movement in city planning. The Romantic planning rejects the concepts of life that makes a human being & its environment subservient to either political power structure or mechanization in the development of a city. Positively the Romantic Movement in planning restored the essential human values excluded from the industrial and autocratic complex. These human values were associated with rural life with more open spaces, clean air sunlight, vegetation & other rural habitat which is favorable for a child to grow in a healthy environment. Simultaneously the romanticism in planning restored the historic continuity to urban forms and institutions which was destroyed for private profit.
The Romantic Movement restored the historic heritage through fresh appreciation of natural landscape which was quite different from the formal geometric patterns. In Romantic planning they abandon the repetitive blocks, unbroken street fronts and created for large units and designed such roads that confirm their width & pavements, as per population and traffic density. They followed contours instead of grading the land. The romantic planner reduced the cost of development and was able to afford more open space for gardens. In this way he beats the utilitarian planner at his own financial game. The other innovation in urban design that was derived from romantic planning movement is of a “Super Block”. It was spontaneously introduced in a Boston area around the middle of 19th century. The super block is not merely a greatly enlarged dimension of usual rectangular block but instead of placing houses only on perimeter it grouped them in cul-de-sacs & clusters. The effect that emerged out of super block is reduction of needless traffic streets, increase in the area of gardens & parks an assurance of greater privacy and quite environment. From historical point of view the Romantic Movement was developed in a theory by Camillo Sitte in his work entitled, “the art of building cities”. In his book Sitte examined that medieval and renaissance city and proved its aesthetic failure due to more rigid kind of geometric planning, with overemphasis on symmetry, uniformity & centralization. Mr. Sitte; shown that irregularity in placing public movements increase its aesthetics where both aesthetically & socially attractive than large avenues framed by uniform buildings designed to increase the speed of vehicles & machine like precision. Mr. Camillo Sitte contributed the concept of diversified neighborhoods, markets, squares & green open spaces rather than uniform avenues & block as the basic unit of planning. These principles were further elaborated by Mr.: Robert Unwin in his book “Town planning in practice” in 1909 as well as in his own planning.

Utopian Planning:
The Utopian planning at first refers to the Thomas Moore’s classic work of Utopia in which he exhibits the elements of all three types of Authoritarian, utilitarian and romantic planning. However as an expression his work discussed about a centralized political authority & geometric formalism as well as his humane views on city in which he describes a neighborhood unit as a center of domestic and civic life. A part from Thomas Moore there is other Utopian planners who have given their concepts on utopian city or an ideal city both in form and function. Such as Robert Owen given an ideal scheme of New Lanark, savannah, Georgia & Melbourne with a large surrounding green belt. Then there is Mr. Walter Burley Griffin who planned the capital of Australia, Canberra in which he suggested the generous scale of suburban planning to new metropolitan. Then came; the Franck Lloyd Wright’s scheme for Broad Acre city where each family gets 13 acres of land within a rigid Grid of lots & roads. The other characteristic of Utopian planning was evident from the work of James silk Buckingham’s concept of “Victoria” and Richardson’s ideal town of Hygiene. Thus the concept of ideal town Utopia was carried out to such extreme that it has ultimately became utopia or no place.

The most successful example of utopia urban planning was that of Sir Ebenezer Howard’s project of Garden city, in which the out line & intention was purely an urban life with its social and economic diversity. In theory the Ebenezer Howard clearly spell out the limitations of authoritarian, utilitarian and utopian planning, however his concepts were basically of an organic planning. His explanatory diagrams were not in any sense a town plan but the later addition of shopping mall & neighborhood unit that developed until 1947 shown a basis for new town design. Before going into details of his ideals of organic planning one must understand the mechanical by-product of utopian theory i.e. the technocratic planning.

Technocratic Utopia:
The terms technocratic utopia was first brought into literature by Bowler Litton through his work “The Coming Race”. The inhabitance of this utopia lived underground & utilizes nuclear energy for both work and destruction. In this kind of utopia all human functions and activities was set up in a large mega structure where every detail of life is subject to absolute autocratic control. The technocratic plan mainly centered on the technological inventions in construction method & materials where as the organization of city will be on a linear pattern along a spinal transportation artery which forms continuous horizontal zones on both sides. Or the creation of simple vertical structure of hundred or two hundred stories high. The most popular and influential form of technocratic ideal was of Le Corbusier in “The City of the Future” first published in 1924 as urbanism. In his conceptual proposal of Paris Le Corbusier formed a central core of office buildings 60 stories high, widely separated and served by multiple to similar apartment houses. Basically his concept addressed the contemporary urban real estate speculation, autocratic as his city of future.

Technocratic Planning:
The technocratic planning describes a process which is going on from last one century; where mechanical services are increasing with huge costs for providing water from distant sources, disposal system of sewerage & garbage, paved streets, rapid transportation systems, tunnels, bridges, multilane highways & large parking lots. The aim of technocratic planning & ideas is to make every urban activity, a function of a machine. In theory technocratic planning assumes that all human problems are open to a technological solution and all human needs can be met by invention of a mechanical or electronic device that can stimulate them & satisfy them or divert them to other channels. The technocratic planning suggests the projects for great urban mega structures, underwater, under ground or a mile high tower in the air with maximized totalitarian control. Therefore if the technocratic planning would be widely adopted it would spell out the end of a city and permanently banish the art of town planning.

Organic Planning:
The concepts of organic planning sprung out from rich knowledge of urban past and better sociological understanding of the nature of cities. These are not considered as a work of art but the focal point in development and expression of a culture. The organic means well organized with a dynamic balance. Therefore organic planning seeks structural answer to every function of city which is expressed in both surface plan & design of buildings with needs & ideals of a community. The organic planning conserves past urban forms & prepares them to accommodate future needs. For example the garden city plan of Ebenezer Howard is the first diagrammatic expression of organic form. The principles of organic planning never been formulated completely. Because they embody such urban complexity which can not be expressed on a purely two-dimensional plan; whereas even in three dimensional additions of building structures still the 4th dimension of time remains ill accounted. The essential nature of the organic planning can be best revealed through historic cities in which growth and development takes place throughout centuries with the 4th dimension of time i.e. Venice, Rome, New Delhi & Mecca can be the best examples. Successive generations starting city building from one point to another through gradual improvement & addition is the specialty of organic planning in which the need plays an important role in the style of a particular era. Because no single generation, no single mind, no single architect or planner could have forecast and designed the final result of the city design. Finally one must not forget the work of Sir Patrick Geddes who was by profession a biologist but made conscious efforts to develop theory of organic planning.

In his reports on Indian cities he showed how much richer the texture of city became when all its functions like civic, religious, domestic & economic were tactfully embraced & integrated in city design He describes that organic planning requires an intimate knowledge of urban culture, human needs, purposes & means with cooperative participation & critical judgment by the community while new plans for city are under process. If modern technology releases working time for such joint civic enterprises, the organic may replace utilitarian, autocratic and technocratic planning as a new order of today.

Modern Planning in Pakistan:
The issue of modern planning in Pakistan is a little bit complex because there is no book available on this issue till date that describes modern planning in Pakistan. There are different authors/ researchers of urban planning in Pakistan who have generated different research papers that are not directly related to this topic but contain some relevant data or allied information. In the following the description of such endeavors is outlined in a logical manner so as the reader may understand the complexity of this issue.

Master Planning in Pakistan – A Historical Perspective[4]
Legal Framework:
There has been no Town and Country Planning law at national level in Pakistan. In the beginning, the only legislation with provision for the preparation of master plans by local councils was the Municipal Administration Ordinance (MAO) 1960. However, this Ordinance did not say anything about plan sanctioning and implementing authorities. Nor it contained any provisions requiring the revision of the plans as and when needed. The MAO 1960 was replaced by Provincial Local Government Ordinance (PLGO) 1979. It simply carried forward the provisions of MAO 1960 about master planning in almost the same words. Like the MAO 1960, only the urban local councils were required to prepare master plans for their jurisdiction under the PLGO 1979 and it was also not mandatory to do so. Thus rural areas of the country received no planning attention even under this Ordinance. However, it was in 1997 when the rural local councils were also given a non mandatory task to prepare and implement master plans for areas under their jurisdiction. Unfortunately, none of the rural local councils could prepare any master plan due mainly to lack of interest of decision makers, and weak institutional capacity.

Recently, the Local Government Ordinance 2001 has replaced the PLGO 1979 as part of the devolution plan of the current military regime. Under the 2001 Ordinance, a new system of Local Government has been established, creating three tiers of local government administration. Each province has been divided into Districts by eliminating the previous rural-urban divide. Each district comprises a few Tehsils/Towns which are again divided into areas of Union Councils. Staff at each administrative level has been appointed by abolition and merger of different existing institutions functioning at provincial and local levels, for better governance at the local level. Thus the Tehsil Municipal Administrations (TMA) has replaced the urban (e.g. Municipal/Town Committees) and rural (e.g. Zila Councils) local councils. All the TMAs in a district are administratively linked with District Government. However, in case of provincial capitals, a City District Government (CDG) has been established by dividing the city into different Town Municipal Administrations. Under the 2001 Ordinance, all the TMAs are required to prepare a master plan for their respective areas and get it approved from their respective Councils. However, this Ordinance does not provide for spatial planning at the district level.

Provisions for master planning can also be found as one of the function of various development authorities or planning agencies in their respective Acts / Ordinances under which these authorities or agencies were created primarily in large cities. For example, these include Karachi Development (KDA) Authority Order 1957, Lahore Development Authority (LDA) Act 1975, and Quetta Development Authority Ordinance 1978. Until recently these development authorities have been working in parallel with local government institutions often with overlapping jurisdictions and duplication of planning powers. Since the reorganization of local government in 2001, these development authorities have been made part of the District Government but as a separate entity.

Preparation and Implementation of Master Plans
Recognizing the need to arrest the ugliness and haphazard growth of big cities of Pakistan and to guide the future development in a planned manner, the Government of Pakistan envisaged in the second five year plan (1960-65) the need of preparation of master plans for eleven major cities in the then West Pakistan. Lahore being the provincial metropolis of the biggest province topped the list of selected cities. Hence, the preparation of Master Plan for Greater Lahore marked the beginning of master planning in Pakistan in 1961. The second Master plan was prepared for Karachi during 1970 to 1974.[5] Afterwards a number of master plans have also been produced for various cities of the country including, for instance, Quetta, Peshawar, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad and Multan. A brief review of some of these master plans suggests that these have adopted the most conventional notion of planning process by Patrick Geddes,[6] that is:

Conduct a SURVEY,
Do an ANALYSIS and then
Make a PLAN

Most of these plans were prepared with foreign assistance. Besides, a large number of what may be termed as mini master plans have also been prepared under the name of Outline Development Plan (ODP) using local technical and financial resources. For instance, in case of Punjab province, the defunct Housing and Physical Planning Department (Recently reorganized as Punjab Housing and Town Planning Agency (PHATA) at the provincial level) has prepared around 125 ODPs for various towns of the Punjab. Similarly, the Project Management Unit (PMU) of Housing and Physical Planning Department undertook `Feasibility Studies and Urban Master Planning of Ten Cities of Punjab’ Project during 1993-94 through a consortium of foreign and local consultants under World Bank funded Third Urban Development Project.[7] More recently, a new master plan for Lahore titled ‘Integrated Master Plan for Lahore – 2021’ (IMPL) has been approved.

Whatever the institutional set up and plan preparation approach have been, the dilemma is that all these types of plans could not be and still are not being fully implemented.[8] Hence, billions of rupees, time and human resources are wasted on this master plan making exercises in the country. And there seems to be no end to it. For instance, various sections of the Provincial Local Government Ordinances promulgated in 2001 provide for preparation of master plans for areas under every Tehsil/Town Municipal Administration (TMA) in all the provinces. This is encouraging and does point towards intention of the Government to manage and guide the growth of urban and rural settlements in a planned manner. But lack of implementation of the earlier plans really poses a challenge for all the stakeholders particularly for the concerned government agencies and the professionals involved in the plan making process to avoid failures of implementation with the new plans. A thorough investigation aimed at determining the root causes of implementation failure and pre-conditions for the successful implementation of master plans is need of the hour and can be helpful for improving master planning in Pakistan in the years to come.
References:
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernism
Gates, Henry Louis 2004. The Norton Anthology of African American Literature. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
[3] For details please log on to the website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_planning
[4] Rizwan Hameed and Obaidullah Nadeem (2006) “Challenges of Implementing Urban Master Plans: The Lahore Experience” Published in PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 17 DECEMBER 2006 ISSN 1307-6884 PWASET VOLUME 17 DECEMBER 2006 ISSN 1307-6884 336 © 2006 www.waset.org From: http://www.waset.org/pwaset/v17/v17-65.pdf
[5] M. I. Mirza, “A Review of the Master Plan for Karachi Metropolitan Region,” in Proc. National Seminar on Planning for Urban Development in the Developing Countries with Special Reference to Pakistan, Lahore, 1978
[6] B. Philip, The Worlds of Patrick Geddes: Biologist, Town Planner, Re-educator, Peace-warrior, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. 1978
[7] HP & EPD., “Feasibility Studies and Urban Master Planning of Ten Cities of Punjab,” Lahore, Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab, 1994
[8] W. A. Butt, “An Evaluation of Outline Development Plan with Special Reference to Gujranwala Division,” M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of City & Regional Planning, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan, 1991

Monday, February 2, 2009

ASSIGNMENT: SUSTAINABLE CITY DESIGN: A CASE OF KARACHI

AR- 309: Architecture & Town Planning (B)

ASSIGNMENT: SUSTAINABLE CITY DESIGN: A CASE OF KARACHI

By

Ravindar Kumar
B. Arch, M. Urban Design
Assistant Professor, DAP-NED

1. Introduction:
The second assignment titled; "SUSTAINABLE CITY DESIGN: A CASE OF KARACHI" is initiated by keeping in mind the current trend of urban planning all over the world. Currently; all urban centers across the globe are working for the betterment of their physical, social and economic environment; so as to make their cities sustainable. Because the ultimate goal for any urban settlement is to achieve the status of a ‘Sustainable City’ Thus; it is imperative for us to think about our city of Karachi to be planned in the same direction.

2. Objective:

The aim of this assignment is to develop the city of Karachi as a Sustainable City by the year 2020. This objective is outlined by keeping in mind an assumption. The assumption is that; “the current Karachi Master Plan 2020 may not make the city of Karachi as a sustainable city.” Thus a research is required to develop policy recommendations and design guidelines for the City District Government Karachi (CDGK) and Government of Sindh (GoS) to take some necessary steps in this direction towards betterment of Karachi and to match up with the world.

3. Methodology:

The methodology of this is assignment include six steps.

The 1st step is the “Identification of Sustainable City Principles”.

The 2nd step is the “Review, Analysis and Evaluation of Karachi Master Plan 2020 on the basis of Sustainable City Principles”.

The 3rd step is “Policy Recommendations” for Karachi to be A Sustainable City.

The 4th step is “Sector Wise Detailed Recommendations” by each working group on their chosen sector of planning i.e. Urban Housing, Urban Infrastructure, Urban Transport, Urban Landscape, Urban Conservation etc.
The 5th step is the “Development of Conceptual Design of Selected Projects at City Level” in each sector.
The 6th step is “Making a Final Report” for CDGK and GoS with proposal for each sector.

4. Submission and Deadlines:

Each working group shall submit their report in a combined format as one report. This report is then submitted to CDGK head by students themselves if approved by the subject teacher. The deadlines for each step are as follows:

Step 1: 13th February 2010
Step 2: 6th March 2010
Step 3: 20th March 2010
Step 4: 3rd April 2010
Step 5: 24th April 2010
Step 6: 1st May 2010